You can’t expect a 12in driver to give the articulation of a 6in driver, and you can’t expect a 6inch driver to push air like a 12in driver ... it’s all a matter of what type of sound you prefer. There are many speakers out there that specializes in accurate/articulate that’s what makes the large JBLs so special
They both have their own special qualities. However, if I had to choose one over the other, and it be my end-game speakers, it would definitely be the Focal speakers. The JBL horn sound is, IMHO, an acquired taste. The Focal speaker's sound presentation, I believe, has more of an universal appeal.
The JBL is an entertainment background music speaker for bars and large spaces. The Focal is a HiFi speaker. If you want quality you take the Focal, but some might like the very "colored" presentation of the JBL for some music genre.
Had sopra 2 , wow always dreamed about jbl but now I seem to line sopra based on the sound , obviously room plays huge role , but went to Martin Logan esl15 and don't miss sopra any more , build quality on sopra is phenomenal, but electrostatic sound is something else ,
Focal sounds more hifi , EVEREST more high end, it’s all about image , size , deep , and bass support. Focal sound more closely seems like more clear but it’s delusion .
Focal might be good for headphone generation people, who loves studio sound or maybe digital sound , clean and precise, it’s they culture the grew up, and it’s not bad. but for old school dudes how still remember how live band action sounds , who knows how big or small stage sounds JBL is the choice, and it’s also not bad.
The JBL is more of a studio sound. The FOCAL is colored. Not sure why everyone thinks that these FOCAL are pure because they aren't. Most people don't realize that FOCAL make great studio monitors and if you compare a FOCAL studio monitor to the Sopra you'll know right away that the Sopra actually sucks.
They sound much different in person. The focal is typical commercial HiFi “very bright” the jbl accurately reproduces the venue (the sound of the stage and space) this was recorded. The jbl is much more accurate to the original recording also is not bright.
False, the Sopra isnt bright as seen by measurements. Subjectively, its open game, one can even call it dull but objectively it isnt and its a very accurate speaker. The JBL on the other hand isnt as accurate. All it has over the Sopra is scale, so a better comparison would be against the Utopias.
I would go for a 10 or 12" in mids...15"or 18" in bass...and waveguided neodyn motor mids like beyma cp755nd ...and right room placement and no panel resonances....and go for at least 95db/1w...efficiency ...better even 100 db....for 1 watt
Guys ,,, look i have a pair of dd66000 and also i have heard the focal , they are great speakers, but this video’s recording does NOT accurately represent the dd66000 at all… its a bad recording sorry just have to point it out, it doesn’t sound anything like this…lol
If this vid doesnt represent the JBL, it doesnt represent the Focal either. What this vid conveys is that the Focal is way way way more transparent and defined than the JBL and that is very apparent in real life. Scale wise the Sopra is not near JBL but rightfully so because of the size. For comparable scale, try the Utopias.
Couldn't be worse for sound evaluation, because of brittle, echoic, reflective sound surfaces. The exact opposite of an music hall or theater. Secondary sound smears coherence.
I can barely hear the difference in this video file, okay But the JBL66000 is clearly more than two notches above the Focal, with dual 15-inch subwoofers, beryllium treble, and big horns. It should be compared to The Focal Grand Utopia
Чертов jbl вч нихрена нету, какие то частоты торчат аж микрофон клипует в фокале ничего не точит, откуда то вч появились..300-600 гц jbl торчащие убежали... Чудес не бывает, тонкие короткоходные нч сч в паре в малом корпусе, рупорный вч это весь набор для эстрадных мониторов но никак не для высокой верности.
@@314Polkovnik все верно, только вот предназначение у рупора иное нежели высокая верность, засчет резонансов паразитных достигается увеличение звукового давление, естественно есть и негативный момент, это нелинейные изза переотражений и неравномерная ачх, так если на проф акустике это выглядит разумно то тут ктото не сожет сделать вч чувствительнее а просто нагружает его на рупор )))) в ссср так делали собирали из того что было, так это изза отсутствия комплектующих а тут то что? Экономия))) рупор стоит комейки а вот голова разработанная заного и материалы - дороже))) так за это люди большие деньги отдают думаю что это какой то изыск)))
Focal ужас !! Я не ожидал от фокала , да верх хорош но где средина ??? Голос как будто провалился тембрально . Рвзые что детальность высокая но звук не очень естесвенный. Конечно сравнивать такие jbl ценовой котегории наверно не правильно. Да и подход рупор немного не уместно эдесь!
I think it's hilarious that the audiophile gods the absolute "experts" will say that JBL is terrible because horns are not audiophile. But then these self-proclaimed experts will turn around and purchase Avantgarde spkrs for $100,000 which are horns! Hideous looking boxes with horns!
Jbl is more realistic and has huge soundstage.it needs huge listening room.so its not equal compairing.focals soundstage is poor.videos cant give information about soundstages.
![JBL vs Klipsch | same song, same setup [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PDzIe3F1yKA/mqdefault.jpg)
Focal Amazing with Clarity Sound.👌👌👌👌👌
Everest sounds like an old radio feeling like listening to the music in the rain
This is how this recording shoud sound :)
You can’t expect a 12in driver to give the articulation of a 6in driver, and you can’t expect a 6inch driver to push air like a 12in driver ... it’s all a matter of what type of sound you prefer. There are many speakers out there that specializes in accurate/articulate that’s what makes the large JBLs so special
Whats the use of pushing so much air below 100hz but you cant get the frequencies above that right?
It's like listening to two different recordings regarding sound quality, one from the 50's/60's and one from now. The Focal's sounds like the latter.
The recording was from the 50’s 60’s so think about it
@@raymondegers6664 I try but my brain hurts
the Focal sound more Open and vocals are more natural and life like....I thought the JBL would have a huge soundstage and win hands down...
Ja, aber Focal hat schlechten Bass.
They both have their own special qualities. However, if I had to choose one over the other, and it be my end-game speakers, it would definitely be the Focal speakers. The JBL horn sound is, IMHO, an acquired taste. The Focal speaker's sound presentation, I believe, has more of an universal appeal.
Depends on the room size. For very large rooms i would go JBL and medium sized i would grab the focal.
The JBL is an entertainment background music speaker for bars and large spaces. The Focal is a HiFi speaker. If you want quality you take the Focal, but some might like the very "colored" presentation of the JBL for some music genre.
If it sounds like the musicians are right there in the room, its "colored", eh?
@@roberte.andrews4621 "colored" means it change the sound in a certain way.
If I am not mistaken these are Sopra 2......you can tell from the smaller low freq woofers as they are 7 inches.......even more amazing then......
I like the midrange on the Focal, but the base and sound stage on the JBL is big.
各スピーカー共にイメージ通りの音ではありましたが、こうやって比較するとここまで違うか！と驚かされました。
やっぱりJBLにしか出せない味があるんだなと
コメントありがとうございます！
個人的にはSOPRA N°3の方がキレが有って好みです。JBLはちょっとぬるいJBLのおとが苦手です。
それにしても、両方所有とは羨ましいです！
DD66000ツイーターの音がほとんど聞こえていないのがはっきり判ります。もう少し条件が整ったら比較対象になると思います。FOCALは、正しく鳴っていて心地良いです。
左右も近すぎますしスピーカーとの距離も近すぎますよね、このスピーカーなら最低でも3.5m以上離れて聴かないとウーファーとツイーターの音がミックスされずまともなステレオ感や音像定位も得られないです、せめて短辺4.5mで20畳ぐらいは無いといい音は出ませんな....
@@下田洋介-w4z LF－MFのタイムアライメントが元々合ってないので曇った音、バイアンプ－チャンデバで、遅延かけて鳴らすと、狭い部屋でも行けるのだが、そういった仕掛けをしないと、距離を取るしかなくなりますね。FOCALは、タイムアライメントの心配が無いユニット構成で、この部屋では有利。
@@棚瀬隆司 なるほど、チャンデバってネットワークの代わり程度だと思ってましたがデジタルのチャンデバだとディレイも掛けられるんですね知りませんでした、プリからパワーのアナログ信号に噛ますとなるとアナログ→デジタル→アナログになるので音質の劣化とかどうなんでしょうか?
@@下田洋介-w4z 各増幅段毎に劣化は有るが、パワーアンプとSPが、直結となると、断然劣化が少ない。A級アンプにて歪率１桁悪く駆動される事が改善され、本来の性能で駆動する事を測定器で確認済み。トータルで音質が向上します。歪率計はパナの名器です。
What do you prefer? good bass? medium and high delicacy?
This is gourmet.
In this room and with these amps I believe the focal just are leaps and bounds above the JBL.
Hartman and Coltrane never sounded better.
OMG Focal wipes the floor with JBL....Everest sounds like a bar music speaker compared to Focal!
It’s a matter of personal taste, of course, but the soundstage and details of the JBL is far superior. Focal seems dull after awhile.
Had sopra 2 , wow always dreamed about jbl but now I seem to line sopra based on the sound , obviously room plays huge role , but went to Martin Logan esl15 and don't miss sopra any more , build quality on sopra is phenomenal, but electrostatic sound is something else ,
JBL N°1, la Focal come tutti i diffusori a torre ha un basso da scatola di plastica, e manca dell'impatto nel medio-basso.
jbl sounds like old patio speakers next to the precise focal lengths. jbl has big stage. the rest is personal taste
Sounds like a hummer vs a ferrari. matter of taste,room size and spouse approval of course. Size matters!
Which one you prefer more in reality?
Which one you prefer more in reality?
Everest is profound and powerful.
Focal has high resolution.
Both are liking.
Focal sounds more hifi , EVEREST more high end, it’s all about image , size , deep , and bass support. Focal sound more closely seems like more clear but it’s delusion .
Focal might be good for headphone generation people, who loves studio sound or maybe digital sound , clean and precise, it’s they culture the grew up, and it’s not bad.
but for old school dudes how still remember how live band action sounds , who knows how big or small stage sounds JBL is the choice, and it’s also not bad.
Who can put such a pair of JBL in his living room (without separation or divorce I mean) ??
The JBL is more of a studio sound. The FOCAL is colored. Not sure why everyone thinks that these FOCAL are pure because they aren't. Most people don't realize that FOCAL make great studio monitors and if you compare a FOCAL studio monitor to the Sopra you'll know right away that the Sopra actually sucks.
They sound much different in person. The focal is typical commercial HiFi “very bright” the jbl accurately reproduces the venue (the sound of the stage and space) this was recorded. The jbl is much more accurate to the original recording also is not bright.
False, the Sopra isnt bright as seen by measurements. Subjectively, its open game, one can even call it dull but objectively it isnt and its a very accurate speaker. The JBL on the other hand isnt as accurate. All it has over the Sopra is scale, so a better comparison would be against the Utopias.
Size doesn't matter :-)
Focal's are smaller, better looking and sounds high end, no compare to JBL...
This is not a good test, the original recording is actually awful and sounds like it’s recorded down a hallway which the jbl reproduce very well.
Not really, this recording is the remastered version.
I would go for a 10 or 12" in mids...15"or 18" in bass...and waveguided neodyn motor mids like beyma cp755nd ...and right room placement and no panel resonances....and go for at least 95db/1w...efficiency ...better even 100 db....for 1 watt
focal win
Guys ,,, look i have a pair of dd66000 and also i have heard the focal , they are great speakers, but this video’s recording does NOT accurately represent the dd66000 at all… its a bad recording sorry just have to point it out, it doesn’t sound anything like this…lol
If this vid doesnt represent the JBL, it doesnt represent the Focal either. What this vid conveys is that the Focal is way way way more transparent and defined than the JBL and that is very apparent in real life. Scale wise the Sopra is not near JBL but rightfully so because of the size. For comparable scale, try the Utopias.
But what is shown is the Sopra No.2
#Beautyfull system,
I prefer Sopra no 3
Both systems suffer from boomy woolly bass. I suspect a bad case case of room boom going on here.
And the microphone I think
Couldn't be worse for sound evaluation, because of brittle, echoic, reflective sound surfaces. The exact opposite of an music hall or theater. Secondary sound smears coherence.
I can barely hear the difference in this video file, okay
But the JBL66000 is clearly more than two notches above the Focal, with dual 15-inch subwoofers, beryllium treble, and big horns. It should be compared to The Focal Grand Utopia
オーディオは難しい、まずは部屋のチューニングからと始めましたが・・・・
Focal is better in this case
Thank you for your comment.
Ones for elevators and the others a Focal,
FOCALの圧勝です EVERESTは音の芯がないというか、聴いていてもつまらない
the jbl sound too close to the wall took them out of the sound area at the back of the speaker
처음엔 소프라가 훨씬 낫다고 판단했는데 두번째 다시 들어보니 에베레스트가 더 깊이 있는 소리입니다. 울림있는 에베레스트가 더 낫군요.
Чертов jbl вч нихрена нету, какие то частоты торчат аж микрофон клипует в фокале ничего не точит, откуда то вч появились..300-600 гц jbl торчащие убежали... Чудес не бывает, тонкие короткоходные нч сч в паре в малом корпусе, рупорный вч это весь набор для эстрадных мониторов но никак не для высокой верности.
может запись? тут явно слышится рупорный окрас
@@314Polkovnik все верно, только вот предназначение у рупора иное нежели высокая верность, засчет резонансов паразитных достигается увеличение звукового давление, естественно есть и негативный момент, это нелинейные изза переотражений и неравномерная ачх, так если на проф акустике это выглядит разумно то тут ктото не сожет сделать вч чувствительнее а просто нагружает его на рупор )))) в ссср так делали собирали из того что было, так это изза отсутствия комплектующих а тут то что? Экономия))) рупор стоит комейки а вот голова разработанная заного и материалы - дороже))) так за это люди большие деньги отдают думаю что это какой то изыск)))
Final super more natural
Oh man... The JBL sounds broken, glad I never stumped up the cash for a pair of those.
Focal ужас !! Я не ожидал от фокала , да верх хорош но где средина ??? Голос как будто провалился тембрально . Рвзые что детальность высокая но звук не очень естесвенный. Конечно сравнивать такие jbl ценовой котегории наверно не правильно. Да и подход рупор немного не уместно эдесь!
Стоит спробовать слушать хотя бьі через Audeze. С серединой и голосами в Focal все в порядке. Jbl точно не хочу.
@@ЮрийРоманенко-ы8р Юрий FOCAL эта модель безусловно хорошая акустика ! Но jbl everest гораздо другой звук ! С новым годом вас!
Sopra
I think it's hilarious that the audiophile gods the absolute "experts" will say that JBL is terrible because horns are not audiophile. But then these self-proclaimed experts will turn around and purchase Avantgarde spkrs for $100,000 which are horns! Hideous looking boxes with horns!
What an overly shitty sound capture. Not even the compressor was removed. That's an insult to our ears!!
Jbl is more realistic and has huge soundstage.it needs huge listening room.so its not equal compairing.focals soundstage is poor.videos cant give information about soundstages.
Sopra soundstage is poor? Get your ears cleaned ffs.
it's rather sopra 2
@@JJ-ig1th the video shows sopra 2 not sopra 3
@@ukaszluki6630 ?? isn't it SOPRA N°3? how do you distinguish from this video?
@@JJ-ig1th I know both models well, the Spora 3 has larger woofers and they are placed closer together
@@ukaszluki6630 great!
Смысл это снимать? Погрешность начинается с микрофона
Focal sounded boring, not alive at lol
What can I say focal - just hifi
ahaha poor old man’s ears